---

 

CLICK HERE TO PHONE BANK FROM HOME!

---

OUR FIVE CORE PRINCIPLES:

Limited Government

Fiscal Responsibility

Personal Responsibility

The Rule of Law

National Sovereignty

 

 

« The Redistricting Proposals... | Front page | Dallas County GOP Chair Deb... »
Early Voting Begins Monday! Who Are You Supporting--and Why?

Fellow Dallas Tea Partiers:

 

Early voting starts MONDAY, MAY 2.

 

There are many contested races on the local ballots this year, and the outcome of these races will have a substantial impact on your local government in the coming years.

 

Please INFORM yourself and your fellow citizens about the candidates, and then VOTE!

 

Please get INFORMED.  Please get ENGAGED.  Please VOTE--and take your family, friends and neighbors with you.

 

It can be difficult to get solid, objective information on local candidates, but you can often learn a great deal from the answers to candidate questionnaires and the public endorsements a candidate receives.  Do you consider yourself aligned with the people endorsing a particular candidate?  If not, that may tell you something.

 

Two sources of information on Dallas local candidates are the League of Women Voters and the Dallas Morning News.  Whether or not you agree with the candidates' answers (or the questions, for that matter) each candidate's answers provide you with some insight into how they think.

 

Here are the links:

 

League of Women Voters - Dallas Voters' Guide:

http://lwvdallas.org/2011_VG_mayor.html

Dallas Morning News Voter Guide:

http://www.thevoterguide.org/v/dallas11/

So, who are you supporting, and why?  Please share your thoughts below.

by Tom Remy  2011-04-30 23:23:43
Reply   permalink
New to the area...don't really know who to vote for....need help to vote for the right people.
by Kathryn Librizzi  2011-05-02 13:22:11
Reply   permalink
Where would I go to find what offices are being voted on in our area and which candidates are the Tea Party approved ones? Prec. No. 025-02; city of murphy; PISD; zip 75094
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:01:37
Reply   permalink
Democrat Debbie Wasserman-Shultz and her gang of dispicable liberal haggetts tries to verbally lynch African-American representative Alen West who served in the military with honors.
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:14:05
Reply   permalink
Americans do not like secret meetings that result in backdoor deals. People do not like finding out what is really in a legislation until after it is passed. That is what is going on now with these Obama/RINO deals floating around in an atttempt to undermine the efforts of Cut/Cap/Balance.

Conservative Pete Sessions was interviewed on Mark Levin (the real veteran of the Ronald Reagan aadministration) and Pete Sessions said he reived a pathetic handout. They are not even real plans.

Basically these are tax and spend proposals that promise sketchy promises of future spending cuts with nothing really substantian to eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now.

Pete Sessions supports Cut/Cap/Balance because it would eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now, has provisions to prevent liberals from using it as an excuse to raise taxes, cuts a substatntial amount of spending now, and does not raise taxes.

Also these deals are probably unconstitutional a
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:14:08
Reply   permalink
Americans do not like secret meetings that result in backdoor deals. People do not like finding out what is really in a legislation until after it is passed. That is what is going on now with these Obama/RINO deals floating around in an atttempt to undermine the efforts of Cut/Cap/Balance.

Conservative Pete Sessions was interviewed on Mark Levin (the real veteran of the Ronald Reagan aadministration) and Pete Sessions said he reived a pathetic handout. They are not even real plans.

Basically these are tax and spend proposals that promise sketchy promises of future spending cuts with nothing really substantian to eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now.

Pete Sessions supports Cut/Cap/Balance because it would eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now, has provisions to prevent liberals from using it as an excuse to raise taxes, cuts a substatntial amount of spending now, and does not raise taxes.

Also these deals are probably unconstitutional a
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:14:09
Reply   permalink
Americans do not like secret meetings that result in backdoor deals. People do not like finding out what is really in a legislation until after it is passed. That is what is going on now with these Obama/RINO deals floating around in an atttempt to undermine the efforts of Cut/Cap/Balance.

Conservative Pete Sessions was interviewed on Mark Levin (the real veteran of the Ronald Reagan aadministration) and Pete Sessions said he reived a pathetic handout. They are not even real plans.

Basically these are tax and spend proposals that promise sketchy promises of future spending cuts with nothing really substantian to eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now.

Pete Sessions supports Cut/Cap/Balance because it would eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now, has provisions to prevent liberals from using it as an excuse to raise taxes, cuts a substatntial amount of spending now, and does not raise taxes.

Also these deals are probably unconstitutional a
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:14:19
Reply   permalink
Americans do not like secret meetings that result in backdoor deals. People do not like finding out what is really in a legislation until after it is passed. That is what is going on now with these Obama/RINO deals floating around in an atttempt to undermine the efforts of Cut/Cap/Balance.

Conservative Pete Sessions was interviewed on Mark Levin (the real veteran of the Ronald Reagan aadministration) and Pete Sessions said he reived a pathetic handout. They are not even real plans.

Basically these are tax and spend proposals that promise sketchy promises of future spending cuts with nothing really substantian to eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now.

Pete Sessions supports Cut/Cap/Balance because it would eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now, has provisions to prevent liberals from using it as an excuse to raise taxes, cuts a substatntial amount of spending now, and does not raise taxes.

Also these deals are probably unconstitutional a
by gloria gibeau  2011-05-01 07:08:43
Reply   permalink
MY ONLY CHOICE IS TOPINSKY...VERY QUALIFIED & EXPERIENCED....RAWLINGS IS SPENDING LOTS OF MONEY ON HIS CAMPAIGN....BUT HAS ALSO SPENT LOTS ON SUPPORTING OBAMA...IS THIS WHAT WE WANT HERE IN DALLAS????
by  dallasjarrod  2011-05-01 10:10:06
Reply   permalink
LOVE the all caps. Really gets the point across.
Rawlings is bad news. With the backing of JWP and the son of the City Secretary, who appoints Election Judges for Local Elections, he's pretty much assured a birth in the Runoff. We must do everything we can to prevent Rawlings from becoming the dictator of Dallas.
Good luck on finding someone named "TOPINSKY" on the ballot.
by  dallasjarrod  2011-05-01 10:21:07
Reply   permalink
I will be voting for Kunkle for Mayor. He's the one who wants to strength our economy by enabling our neighborhoods to grow, not by grand spending plans that 2 other candidates mistake for "investment." "Investment" has become the buzz word around DC, with Obama declaring that we're going to "invest" in our future. We all know that means "more spending." Generally speaking, I just think that the City needs to get out of the way and let us start and operate businesses. The City can be a partner in getting the ball rolling, which is what Kunkle wants to do. We need more development like Bishop Arts, not more Taxpayer-Owned Hotels or pretty bridges. We need a Mayor who has been responsible for the largest single department operating within the Dallas Budget. Kunkle proved himself to be a great leader as the DPD Chief and knows how to budget.

If there's a runoff, then I'm officially "Anybody But Rawlings." He should be running for Mayor of Chicago, not Dallas.

Do your researc
by  CitizenJane  2011-05-01 15:00:21
Reply   permalink
Please research the groups Natinsky is heavily involved with: Vision North Texas, North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), National League of Cities, Vision North Texas - these are all organizations working to "stack and pack" people, remove our mobility by car, move away from single family homes - all in the name of sustainable development, AKA Local UN Agenda 21 (global redistribution of wealth). I don't know who you should vote for, but it isn't Natinsky!
by Bill in Dallas  2011-05-01 15:56:58
Reply   permalink
Why are we always given crap to vote for, always having to pick the best of the worst? God how I hate DC and Dallas corruption, all the choices SUCK.
by Larry Wainer  2011-05-01 18:37:21
Reply   permalink
Please support our Tea Party activist friends for Dallas City Council:
Kirk Launius for District 9
Donna Starnes for District 12
« The Redistricting Proposals... | Front page | Dallas County GOP Chair Deb... »